The current government invests heavily in the renovation of historic structures, even in contexts where they need to address pressing issues of societal daily necessity. Some claim that these structures are obsolete and ought to be demolished and replaced. I personally disagree with this position.
First, the historical value of ancient structures necessitates their preservation. The Forbidden City in China and Notre Dame Cathedral in France are, respectively, national and cultural symbols. If these ancient structures are appropriately preserved, youngsters will be able to learn about their cultural heritage and develop a stronger sense of national pride. These structures facilitate the export of culture during times of peace and normal national interactions. In addition, during times of crisis and conflict, when individuals must maintain a strong sense of patriotism and protect national interests, cultural symbols of the nation, such as architecture, are essential to the sense of national unity.
Additionally, historic buildings have both economic and historical value. One of the oldest countries in Europe, Spain has well-preserved ancient structures that contribute to its tourism industry. In addition, the Spanish government has taken a different approach to economic sustainability in the preservation of ancient buildings: the Royal Post model, in which historical and culturally significant ancient buildings that cannot be fully preserved are converted into hotels, ensuring economic growth while preserving them.
Under the pressure of exponential population growth, it is understandable to replace certain ageing structures with new ones , primarily high-rise buildings. This is as a result of the fact that modern buildings can accommodate more people without taking up excessive space, thereby reducing the burden of overcrowding. Nonetheless, there are numerous alternatives to the conventional solutions to this social issue. For instance, by constructing new buildings in the suburbs, the cost of new buildings may be more affordable than in cities.
In conclusion, due to their incomparable historical value and potential financial return, I believe it is imperative to subsidise the maintenance of historic buildings.
